Page 24 - Layout 1
P. 24




CURRENT CONCEPTS



ACL Tears in Athletes with Open Physes
Some patients developed MRI documented focal physeal 

disruption without a perceived clinical growth disturbance. 
Traditional surgical techniques for adult ACL reconstruction Moreover comparing the physes of the surgically 
include the creation of transphyseal tunnels followed by graft 
reconstructed knee and the contralateral knee 6 months 
tensioning and fixation. In the skeletally immature patient, postoperatively, MR imaging showed narrowing of the 
conventional tunnel placement and graft tensioning risks 
iatrogenic growth disturbance caused by physeal violation. growth plates in the reconstructed knee in comparison with 
that in the contralateral knee. Radiographic analyses showed 
Multiple animal and human clinical series have documented corticalization around the drill holes in all cases. Although ACL 
such growth disturbances. More recent animal studies 
reconstruction caused narrowing or the early closure of the 
have investigated the effect of small tunnels and soft-tissue open physes in adolescents, the patients did not experience 
grafts on physeal bar formation and subsequent growth 
limb-length discrepancies and angular deformities. All 
arrest. They confirmed that the presence of soft-tissue the authors concluded that, although transphyseal 
grafts in the transphyseal tunnels prevented physeal bar 
reconstruction of the ACL may not be a benign procedure 
formation. Furthermore they also found that transphyseal in younger children with substantial growth potential, it is 
tunnels that occupy <5% of the physeal cross-sectional 
possible to safely perform this procedure in adolescents with 
area do not appear to cause growth disturbance. However, limited growth remaining.
when >7% to 9% of the cross-sectional area of the physis 
is violated, growth disturbance is possible even in the Independently from the surgical technique adopted to 

presence of a soft-tissue graft. Clinical reports of growth reconstruct the ACL, an unanimous agreement has been 
disturbance are rare. Kocher et al. surveyed members of the found concerning the graft choice. In case of a prepubescent 
patient, a tendon with bone plugs (e.g., bone-patellar 
Herodicus Society and ACL Study Group regarding growth 
disturbance after skeletally immature ACL reconstruction tendon bone graft) may induce local growth arrest if placed 
across the physis, so a soft tissue graft must be used. In 
and noted 15 cases of growth disturbance out of more 
than 500 ACL reconstructions. They concluded that case of pubescent patients with closing physes the graft 
selection follows the same indications as the adult patients 
associated risk factors for growth disturbance included 
fixation hardware across the physis, large tunnels (≥12 mm), and the surgeon preference. Conversely, there has been 
lateral extra-articular tenodesis, dissection in proximity to considerable controversy regarding the use of autograft 

the perichondrial ring of LaCroix, and suturing near the tibial versus allograft tissue. In a recent study, the Multicenter 
tubercle. More recent clinical studies have examined the Orthopaedic Outcomes Network patient database was 
analyzed to evaluate graft choice and the risks associated 
use of MRI to characterize physeal injury after transphyseal 
ACL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients. Using a with failure and graft rupture. Patients between ages 10 and 
19 years were found to have the highest percentage of graft 
custom three-dimensional modeling following transphyseal 
ACL reconstruction, it has been found that, with 8-mm failures regardless of graft type. Moreover, the odds of graft 
rupture were four times higher with allograft reconstruction 
tunnels, less than 3% of the cross-sectional area of the 
physis is violated. Moreover, using a custom computerized than with autograft reconstruction.

model of the physis, it has been documented that tunnel Modern surgical techniques can be classified as physeal 
diameter is potentially more offensive to the physis than sparing, partial transphyseal and complete transphyseal. A 
drill angle. Also the effect of an anatomic positioning of the 
variety of physeal-sparing techniques has been described. 
femoral tunnel with the use of single – or double-bundle In one technique, the hamstring tendons were kept intact at 
techniques has been investigated. The anatomic placement 
their distal attachment, passed through a transepiphyseal 
of the femoral tunnel is drilled at a more oblique angle that, tibial tunnel, looped over a staple at the femoral ACL origin, 
if performed in a skeletally immature patient, places the brought back through the tibial tunnel, and sutured onto 

lateral physis at an increased risk of injury. Using a computer- themselves. In a second technique an autograft hamstring 
aided three-dimensional model to incorporate the drilling tendon was passed through the distal femoral epiphysis 

of an anatomic double-bundle ACL femoral tunnel with a and fixed using a suspension fixation device over the lateral 
variety of drill-hole diameters it has been found that the femoral condyle.

average physeal volume removed, as a percentage of the 
total physeal volume, was between 3.7% and 6.5%. Based 
on these data, anatomic double-bundle drill-hole placement 

during ACL reconstruction seems to produce a zone of 
physeal injury that appears to increase the risk of abnormal 

growth in the distal femoral physis postoperatively. Several 
other studies with MRI investigated the postoperative effects 

a transphyseal ACL reconstruction on the growth plate in 
young athletes. It was confirmed that the average bone 

tunnel–to–growth plate cross-sectional area ratio was less 
than 3%.




22 ISAKOS NEWSLETTER 2014: Volume II
02




   22   23   24   25   26