ISAKOS Congress 2021

2021 ISAKOS Biennial Congress Paper

 

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty humeral and glenoid variations influence on range of motion: a standardized computer model study

Antonio Arenas-Miquelez, MD, FEBOT, NSW AUSTRALIA
Richard James Murphy, MBChB MA MRCS DPhil FRCS(Orth), Brighton UNITED KINGDOM
Andrea Rosa, PhD, Lugano, Ticino SWITZERLAND
Davide Caironi, ., Milan ITALY
Matthias A. Zumstein, Prof., Bern SWITZERLAND

Inselspital, Bern, Bern, SWITZERLAND

FDA Status Not Applicable

Summary

The semi-inlay 145º stem combined with 4 mm lateralization and 2 mm inferior eccentricity glenosphere is the middle ground for the most all-purpose approach in RTSA.

Abstract

Background

There have been multiple modifications to the initial reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) designed by Grammont to improve range of motion (ROM) and avoid notching. The effect of these changes in shoulder kinematics and the best compromise for ROM is still under debate.

Purpose

To evaluate on a computer model scenario the influence of humeral design, humeral neck-shaft angle (NSA), glenoid lateralization, and glenoid eccentricity on ROM of RTSA.

Methods

We created a 3-dimensional computer model from computed tomography scans of 13 patients with primary osteoarthritis simulating implantation of a standardized reverse shoulder arthroplasty. We created 7 different stem and 7 different glenoshere configurations to analyze the effect of 4 different variables on impingement-free ROM: humeral design (inlay vs. semi-inlay vs. onlay), humeral NSA (135° vs. 145° vs. 155°), glenoid lateralization, and glenoid eccentricity on ROM. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis analysis to compare ROMs and applied a Dunn correction for multiple inter-group comparisons.

Results

The use of different humeral stem designs did not have a significant effect on total global ROM. Reducing NSA demonstrated a significant increase in adduction, and external and internal rotation in adduction, whereas a decrease in abduction and external rotation in abduction. Glenosphere lateralization was the most effective method for increasing total global ROM (P < .0001); however, extreme lateralization (+12 mm) did not show significant benefit compared with moderate lateralization (+4 mm). Glenosphere eccentricity increased only adduction and internal rotation in adduction.

Conclusion

Only glenoid lateralization has a significant effect on increasing total global ROM in RTSA. The use of the semi-inlay 145° model combined with 4 mm lateralization and 2 mm inferior eccentricity represents the middle ground and the most universal approach in RTSA.

International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine

567 Sycamore Valley Road W.
Danville, CA, USA 94526
Tel: +1 925.807.1197 • Fax: +1 925.807.1199