2023 ISAKOS Biennial Congress ePoster
Optimal Joint Loading Strategies to Lessen Cartilage Changes after ACL Reconstruction Differ Throughout the Postoperative Recovery
Dalton House, BS UNITED STATES
Sawyer Blair, BS, Lexington, Kentucky UNITED STATES
Cale A. Jacobs, PhD, Lexington, KY UNITED STATES
Caitlin Conley, PhD, Lexington, KY UNITED STATES
Darren L. Johnson, MD, Lexington, KY UNITED STATES
Austin V Stone, MD, PhD, Lexington, KY UNITED STATES
University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, UNITED STATES
FDA Status Not Applicable
Summary
Relative under- and overloading 6 months after ACLR are associated with cartilage degradation.
ePosters will be available shortly before Congress
Abstract
Purpose
Both under- and overloading the joint after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have been reported to impact early postoperative cartilage changes. Despite the lack of consensus, conflicting rehabilitation programs are being developed to promote either increasing or decreasing joint loading at different time points after surgery. To help inform postoperative rehabilitation, the purpose of this systematic review was to determine whether relative under- or overloading is associated with imaging and/or biochemical biomarkers of cartilage degradation after ACLR, and whether these associations differ over time.
Methods
A literature search was conducted using the PubMed database to identify studies of ACL-reconstructed patients that reported knee joint moments and/or vertical ground reaction forces and at least one imaging or biochemical biomarker of cartilage degeneration. The initial search produced 357 publications for consideration of which 15 studies (510 patients) satisfied the inclusion criteria. We then recorded the method of cartilage degeneration measurement, whether increased or decreased joint loading was associated with imaging and biochemical biomarkers of cartilage degradation, and the time point when joint loading and cartilage changes were assessed.
Results
There was no clear trend in whether cartilage degradation was associated with relative under vs. overloading in the early postoperatiave period. Three studies reported underloading was associated with cartilage degradation whereas two studies reported that overloading was associated with cartilage degradation. On the contrary, much more consistent results were seen at later time points. Between 18 months and 8 years after ACLR, overloading was consistently associated with degenerative cartilage changes when using either MRI or ultrasound imaging biomarkers (7/7 studies, 287 patients). Two studies (49 patients) reported that decreased joint loading two years or later after ACLR was associated with increased serum and/or plasma biomarkers of cartilage degradation. While underloading compared to the contralateral limb was associated with serum and plasma cartilage biomarkers at later time points, it remains unclear if systemic biomarkers are evidence of increased cartilage remodeling in either the involved or uninvolved limb.
Discussion
Both relative under- and overloading 6 months after ACLR were associated with biomarkers of early cartilage degradation whereas overloading was consistently associated with imaging biomarkers of cartilage changes 18 months or more after surgery. The under-rehabilitated knee continues to threaten long-term joint health, and the current results suggest that rehabilitation strategies are needed to both promote optimal loading in the early postoperative period while also avoiding overloading 18 months or more after ACLR.