Summary

The present study indicates ACT as an effective treatment option for femorotibial- as well as patellofemoral cartilage defects with a high long-term survival and low conversion rate as well as good long-term results regarding knee function and satisfaction

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate postoperative complications and associated risk factors for failure following Autologue Chondrocyte Transplantation (“ACT”) as well as its long-term survival and clinical function. It was hypothesized, that ACT is a safe technique for cartilage repair with a low incidence of postoperative complications and rare rates of revision surgery combined with a high long-term survival and good to excellent clinical outcome in long-term-follow-up.

Methods

All patients undergoing ACT-Cs of the knee joint between 2006 and 2012 at the author’s institution were included in this retrospective study. Concomitant procedures had been performed if necessary. Early postoperative complications, revision surgeries, failure and risk factors for those events were evaluated 6 months after the surgery. Long term clinical outcome was assessed using the Lysholm Score, the Tegner Score, a 10-grade scale for satisfaction and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at a minimum follow-up of 9 years postoperatively. Long term survival was calculated using revision surgeries, clinical failures and conversion procedures to create a Kaplan-Meier-analysis. A subgroup analysis for different defect locations was performed. 139 patients were included in this study (27% female/ 73%male; age 26.7 [21.7;35.2] years). The median defect size was 4.0 [3.0;6.0] cm² (40% medial femoral condyle (MFC), 17% lateral femoral condyle (LFC), 36% patella, 19% trochlea). 97 (70%) of the patients had undergone previous surgery and 84 (60%) underwent concomitant procedures.

Results

Postoperatively, 8% of patients had complications (4% bleeding, 2% arthrofibrosis, 2% infection), 7% of patients needed revision surgery. 12% of patients had a prolonged deficit in ROM, that did not require revision surgery. No significant difference in terms of complications was found between the patellofemoral and femorotibial group. Patients demonstrated good patient reported long-term outcomes 9-15 years after the index surgery (Tegner: 4.7±1.8; VAS: 2.4±2.1; Lysholm: 80±14; satisfaction with operation: 7.3±1.9). Survival rates were 88% at 9 years, 85% at 11 years, and 85% at 13 years after the index procedure. Reasons for failure included debridement of ACT (n=4; 5%), revision ACT (n=3, 3%), conversion to total knee arthroplasty (n=3, 3%) and conversion to High tibial osteotomy (HTO)(n=1; 1%)).

Conclusion

The present study indicates ACT as an effective treatment option for femorotibial- as well as patellofemoral cartilage defects with a high long-term survival and low conversion rate as well as good long-term results regarding knee function and satisfaction. Postoperative complications needing revision surgery are rare. Prolongated deficits of range of motion appear frequently up to six months especially in patellofemoral defects, but can often be successfully addressed by intensified physiotherapy without requiring an arthrolysis.