2023 ISAKOS Biennial Congress ePoster
Continuous Vertical Inside-Out Versus Traditional Vertical Inside-Out Meniscal Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison
José Leonardo Rocha De Faria , MD, MSc, Rio De Janeiro, RJ BRAZIL
Arthur Paiva Grimaldi Santos, M.Sc., Florianópolis, Santa Catarina BRAZIL
Douglas Mello Pavão, MD, MSc, PhD, Petrópolis, RJ BRAZIL
Mariana Radulski, Medical Student, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina BRAZIL
Ana Carolina Leal, PhD, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro BRAZIL
Ari Digiácomo Ocampo Moré, PhD, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina BRAZIL
Alan de Paula Mozella, PhD, Prof., Rio De Janeiro, RJ BRAZIL
Joao ANTONIO MATHEUS GUIMARAES, RJ BRAZIL
Robert F. LaPrade, MD, PhD, Edina, MN UNITED STATES
Carlos Rodrigo De Mello Roesler, PhD, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina BRAZIL
Rodrigo Salim, MD,PhD, Ribeirao Preto, SP BRAZIL
Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, BRAZIL
The FDA has not cleared the following pharmaceuticals and/or medical device for the use described in this presentation. The following pharmaceuticals and/or medical device are being discussed for an off-label use: Síntegra Surgical Sciences, Meniscus 4-ALL
Summary
This study indicates that the continuous vertical inside-out meniscal suture technique is biomechanically similar to the technique established in the literature, being a possible therapeutic option to be used
ePosters will be available shortly before Congress
Abstract
Background
Biomechanical assessment of meniscal repairs is essential for evaluating different meniscal suturing methods and techniques. The continuous meniscal suture technique is a new method of meniscal repair and has not yet been biomechanically evaluated.
Purpose
To evaluate the displacement, stiffness after cyclical loads, and load to failure for a continuous vertical inside-out meniscal suture versus a traditional vertical inside-out meniscal suture in a porcine medial meniscus.
Study Design: Controlled Laboratory Study
Methods
Thirty porcine knees were acquired and divided into two test groups of 15 knees each. A 2.0 cm longitudinal red-white zone transition lesion was created in the body of the medial meniscus of all knees. The continuous suture (CS) group (group A) received four vertical stitches performed with a continuous vertical meniscal suture technique, and the traditional suture (TS) group (group B) received a traditional vertical suture with four stitches.
Results
The displacement after a cyclic test was 0.52 ± 0.12 mm and 0.48 ± 0.07 for the CS and TS groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed between both groups (p = 0.3108). In the load-to-failure test, the ultimate load was 219.9 ± 61.6 N and 238.3 ± 71.3 N in the CS and TS groups, respectively. There were no significant differences between both groups (p = 0.4623). The system's stiffness at the last cycle was 36.2 ± 1.8 N/mm and 35.3 ± 2.4 N/mm for groups A and B, respectively. The two groups had no significant difference (p = 0.2340).
Conclusion
A continuous vertical meniscal suture created a beneficial configuration for treating longitudinal meniscal lesions, biomechanically similar to a traditional vertical suture technique. Therefore, the continuous vertical suture technique appears to be a good option for the surgical treatment of longitudinal tears of the medial meniscus.