2025 ISAKOS Congress in Munich, Germany

2025 ISAKOS Biennial Congress ePoster


EVALUATION OF TIBIAL VARUS OSTEOTOMY FOR THE CORRECTION OF VALGUS KNEES

Vitor Barion Castro De Padua, PhD, Sao Paulo, SP BRAZIL
Marcelo Rodrigues Torres, MD, Goiania BRAZIL
Diego Ariel De Lima, MD, PhD, Mossoro, RN BRAZIL
José Leonardo Rocha De Faria , MD, MSc, PhD, Rio De Janeiro, RJ BRAZIL

universidade de Marilia, Marilia, Sao Paulo, BRAZIL

FDA Status Not Applicable

Summary

Outcomes of patients with symptomatic valgus deformity of the knee who underwent medial closure wedge varus osteotomy of the proximal tibia. The procedure corrects the axis in both flexion and extension, was performed on 54 patients, with a follow-up of 5.5 years. Results showed significant pain relief and satisfaction in 92% of cases, validating the procedure as an effective treatment option.

ePosters will be available shortly before Congress

Abstract

Introduction

Geno Valgus deformity is a risk factor for progression of arthrosis in the lateral compartiment of the knee. When symptomatic, and without improvement of pain with clinical treatment, varus osteotomy becomes a treatment option. Usually the correction of the deformity is made in the distal femur. But often the deformity can occur in the tibia. In these cases, and without the obliquity of the joint line , the proximal tibia vaus osteotomy is an interesting option. An advantage of the tibial ostetomy is to correct the axis in flexion and extension, differently of the femoral osteotomy that only corrects in extension.

Objective

To evaluate the evolution of patients who presented valgus deformity in a symptomatic knee and underwent correction through the medial closure wedge varus osteotomy of the proximal tibia.

Methods

Patients with valgus deformity of up to 12 were included, and joint line obliquity less than 10 degrees were submitted to surgical treatment. The objective of the correction is the axis of 180 degrees, avoiding the hypercorrection in Varus. After the resection of the medial wedge, the osteotomy was fixed with a small locked plaque, discharged on the following day without immobilization and with a load with crutches as tolerated. We selected 54 patients from 2005 to 2018, 29 males with a mean age of 46 years (20-67). In 2 cases it was associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, 1 case with mosaicoplasty and 1 case of medial patelo femoral ligament reconstruction. We revised 48 patients with the mean follow up of 5.5 years (6 months to 13 years).

Results

All cases healed, there was no alteration of the patellar height or tibial slope. There was one complication that was infection, where the plaque was removed. 23 patients without pain complaints were very satisfied, and 21 with mild pain wer satisfied. 92% increased their activities, and improved pain, and would do the procedure again. 1 Patient with mild pain was unsatisfied and 2 with moderate pain were also dissatisfied. These, 2 were obese and the initial deformity was in the femur and not in the tibia. 1 patient evolved with re-rupture of the ACL being submitted to revision and 1 evolved to total knee arthroplasty 9 years after osteotomy.

Conclusion

Varus osteotomy in the proximal tibia, if indicated in cases of valgus in the tibia and joint line with obliquity less than 10 degrees, is a viable option in the correction of valgus deformity and leads to good results .