2025 ISAKOS Congress in Munich, Germany

2025 ISAKOS Biennial Congress ePoster

 

Medial Patellotibial Ligament Reconstruction Obtains A Significant Improvement Of Patellar Stability: Motion Analytic Study

Nadhaporn Saengpetch, MD, Phyathai, Bangkok THAILAND
Potsawat Surabotsopon, MD, Phyathai, Bangkok THAILAND

Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Phyathai, Bangkok, THAILAND

FDA Status Cleared

Summary

MPTL reconstruction restores the patellar stability and improves patella alta that shows in motion analytic study.

ePosters will be available shortly before Congress

Abstract

Background

The medial patello-tibial ligament (MPTL) proved by anatomy that it restrained patellar stability as same as medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). This study demonstrated motion analytic study to prove its function after simulated patellar lateral dislocation with MPTL reconstruction.

Methods

Twelve cadaveric knees were recruited and cut the medial patellar structure to create lateral patellar dislocation. The patellofemoral motion was determined using a 3-dimensional motion analysis (3DMA). MPFL reconstruction versus MPFL and MPTL reconstruction were compared in six-direction measurement those were superior-inferior, medial-lateral and anterior-posterior translation. The knee bending were set at 0, 30, 45, 60, 90 degrees.

Results

MPFL and MPTL reconstruction showed statistically significant difference compared with MPFL reconstruction for medial- lateral translation in all knee bending angles. The 30 degrees bending (0.31±0.36 vs -0.01±0.15 mm, p<0.001), 45 degrees (0.34±0.39 vs -0.02±0.14 mm, p<0.001), 60 degrees (0.38±0.42 vs -0.01±0.14 mm, p<0.001) and 90 degrees (0.38±0.38 vs -0.03±0.20 mm, p<0.001). MPFL and MPTL reconstruction also obtained the statistical difference for kinematic restoration for patellofemoral superior translation when the knee bending at 45 degrees (-0.08±0.21 vs -0.08±0.21mm, p <0.001). For the anterior-posterior translation, there was statistically significant difference for knee bending at 45 degrees (-0.09±0.28 vs 0.07±0.37 mm, p <0.001), 60 degrees (-0.17±0.33 vs 0.16±0.36 mm, p <0.001) and 90 degrees (-0.13±0.45 vs 0.19±0.34 mm, p <0.001).

Conclusions

Additional MPTL reconstrcution with MPFL could restored the medial stabilization of patellar stability that proved with motion analytic study in cadaveric knees. It also obtained the superior patellar translation in patellar instability with patella alta when knee bending at 45 degrees flexion. Thus MPTL reconstruction should be considered for surgical treatment of lateral patellar instability.