2025 ISAKOS Congress in Munich, Germany

2025 ISAKOS Biennial Congress ePoster

 

High failure rate in meniscal repair when preceding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an analysis of two-stage surgery for concomitant ACL and meniscus tear.

Christoffer von Essen, MD, PhD, Stockholm SWEDEN
Capio Artro Clinic, STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN

FDA Status Not Applicable

Summary

The risk of meniscus repair failure is increased when a staged procedure is chosen for an ACL-deficient knee, particularly in medial meniscus interventions and among females.

ePosters will be available shortly before Congress

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the failure rate, predictive factors associated with failure and clinical outcomes
after a two-stage surgery; meniscus repair followed by subsequent anterior cruciate ligament
(ACL) reconstruction (ACLR).

Methods

Patients with a concomitant meniscus and ACL injury who underwent a two-stage surgery
between January 2015 and January 2021 were identified. The primary outcome was meniscal
repair failure, defined as a reoperation (re-repair or resection). A Cox-regression analysis was
used in order to analyze factors associated with meniscal repair failure within 3 years after the
primary surgery for a meniscal repair. Secondary outcomes were range of motion (ROM),
anterior knee laxity and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 1 and 2
years, follow-up. The thresholds of Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), Treatment
Failure (TF), Minimum Important Change (MIC) were applied to KOOS4 (mean score of the
KOOS Pain, Symptoms, Sports/Rec and QoL subscales).

Results

A total of 150 patients were included. The meniscal repair failure rate after 3 years was 36.7%.
Failure of meniscal repair was significantly associated with a time interval >1 year between the
meniscal repair to the ACLR (HR 2.5; 95% CI 1.2-5.5; P<0.01), medial meniscus repair (HR 2.3;
95% CI 1.6-3.4; P<0.01), and female sex (HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.0-1.9; P=0.01). The age of the
patient was not associated with meniscal repair failure. At the 6-month follow-up, most patients
(72.5%) showed less than 2mm of knee laxity; 4 patients (6.7%) experienced loss of extension
and 4 patients (1.7%) experienced loss of flexion. On the KOOS4, at the 2-year follow-up, PASS
was achieved in 53.4%, TF occurred in 1.7%, and MIC was reached in 36.4% of patients.
Meniscal repair failure it did not have a negative impact on objective and subjective outcomes.

Conclusion

A longer time interval from meniscal repair to ACLR, medial meniscus repair, and female sex
were associated with an increased risk of meniscal repair failure. Even though a high failure rate
of 36.7% was seen, it did not have a negative impact on objective and subjective outcomes.