Search Filters

  • Media Source
  • Presentation Format
  • Media Type
  • Media Year
  • Language
  • Diagnosis / Condition
  • Diagnosis Method
  • Patient Populations
  • Treatment / Technique

Higher Risk of Rupture for the Controlateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament in Comparison with the Affected Knee in a Series of 244 Patients with a Long-Term Follow-Up Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Higher Risk of Rupture for the Controlateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament in Comparison with the Affected Knee in a Series of 244 Patients with a Long-Term Follow-Up Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Alberto Grassi, PhD, ITALY Luca Macchiarola, MD, ITALY Tommaso Roberti di Sarsina, MD, ITALY Federico Raggi, MD, ITALY Ilaria Cucurnia, MD, ITALY Gian Andrea Lucidi, MD, ITALY Stefano Zaffagnini, MD, Prof., ITALY

Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli - University of Bologna , Bologna, ITALY


2019 Congress   Paper Abstract   2019 Congress   Not yet rated

 

Anatomic Location

Anatomic Structure

Diagnosis / Condition

Sports Medicine

Ligaments

ACL


Summary: This retrospective study showed that in a cohort of homogeneous patients by ACL reconstruction technique there is a higher risk of contralateral ACL injury than graft failure, especially in young and active patients.


Introduction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a well established procedure with high success rates. The literature shows that in the short-medium term there is an high risk of rupture of the contralateral ACL, especially in young athletes. The aim of this study was to investigate the failure rate of ACL reconstruction and the injury to
contralateral ACL, identfying demographic predictors in a single-center population of patients treated with the same
surgical technique.

Methods

All patients operated from 2007 to 2008 of ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendons and single-bundle technique and with contralateral knee without previous surgical interventions were surveyed collecting informations regarding postoperative complications or reoperations of the ipsilateral knee and the ACL reconstruction in the contralateral knee. Age, sex, level of pre.operative sport activity and smoke were evaluated as possible predictors of ipsi or contralateral ACL reconstruction.

Results

Overall, 244 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 30 years, with 12% of patients <18 years old; moreover, 76% were male, 70% had a pre-injury Tegner activity >5 and 31% were smoker at time of injury. The overall rate of patients that underwent revision ACL reconstruction during the considered follow-up was 3.3%, with no
significant effects of partients characteristics. Contralateral ACL reconstruction was perfromed in 7.8% of patients. Survivorship curves were similar until the 2-years, but after 2 years the survival of contralateral ACL was significantly
lower (p=0.0297). Patients win an age <18 years (OR=2.7, p=0.0110) and pre-op Tegner Level >5 (OR=10.5, p=0.0201)
had an higher risk of experiencing a second ACL reconstruction. Specifically 24.1% of patients <18 years underwent
ipsilateral revision or contralateral reconstruction during the considered follow-up (p=0.0059).

Discussion And Conclusion

This retrospective study showed that in a cohort of homogeneous patients by ACL reconstruction technique there is a higher risk of contralateral ACL injury than graft failure, especially in young and active patients. Moreover, 1 out of 4 patients with age at surgery <18 is likely to experience ipsilateral ACL revision or
contralateral ACL reconstruction during a 10-year follow-up period. Threfore further studies are needed to identify modificable risk factors and optimize rehabilitation and prevention of further ACL injuries