2025 ISAKOS Biennial Congress ePoster
How Successful Are Meniscal Repair All-Inside Implants During Deployment?
David C. Flanigan, MD, Columbus, OH UNITED STATES
Emma Flanigan, research student, Columbus, Ohio UNITED STATES
Sonu Bae, BS, Columbus, Ohio UNITED STATES
Tyler Barker, PhD, Columbus, Ohio UNITED STATES
Jameson Crane Sports Medicine Institute at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, UNITED STATES
FDA Status Cleared
Summary
Overall failure rate of meniscal implants is low
ePosters will be available shortly before Congress
Abstract
Objective
Meniscal tears are one of the most common knee injuries. Symptomatic tears are routinely treated by meniscectomies, which can lead to knee osteoarthritis, or by meniscal repairs that preserve the meniscus but potentially increase reoperation risk. An all-inside meniscus repair utilizes implants to fixate the meniscus at a higher cost than traditional inside out or outside in suturing technique. The success rate of these meniscal implants, however, is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the percentage of implants successfully deployed during arthroscopic all-inside repair.
Methods
A data query of meniscus repair (CPT codes: 29882 and 29883) procedures was performed at a single institution. The query was limited to include procedures performed between June 1, 2020 and June 1, 2023. Multiple different manufacturer implants were used by 5 sports medicine fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons. The number of implants successfully used and number of implants wasted due to intra-operative failure during meniscal repair were found on EPIC and documented for each procedure. Success rate of meniscal implants was determined by dividing the number of implants wasted by the total amount of implants used.
Results
The query identified 1026 patients that underwent meniscus repair. From this cohort, 3,867 total meniscal implants for an average of 3.77 implants per case. Overall, all inside meniscus repair was found to have a low implant failure or waste rate (1.03% [n = 40]). The highest failure rates were found with JuggerStitchTM Curved (9.38%), NOVOSTITCHTM Cartridge 0 Suture (2.44%), and TRUESPANTM 12 Degrees (2.11%) implants.
Conclusions
The most important finding was that the overall failure rate of meniscal implants is low. Implants with higher waste rates should be addressed by industry and considered by surgeons when selecting surgical implants. These preliminary findings establish the necessity to further examine implant failure rate and associated costs of meniscus repair.