Review Process
The review process with follow the 2025 ISAKOS Congress abstract submission protocol
and timeline. All abstracts are blindly reviewed by committees of qualified
orthopaedic surgeons.
Abstract Grading Criteria
Abstracts are graded on a scale from 0.0 to 12.0 (12.0 being the best) based on the following:
-
Scientific Merit (0-6, with 6 points max)
- Is the problem clearly stated?
- Are the statistics sound?
- Are there adequate numbers of subjects?
- How is the methodology? {are there controls?, is this prospective vs. retrospective?}
- Is the abstract clear / well written and are the results clear?
- Are the conclusions supported by the results?
- Originality of Project (0-2)
- Clinical Usefulness (0-2)
- Level of Interest to ISAKOS Members (0-2)