Precision of Tibiofemoral Angle Assessment: A Comparative Analysis of Long Leg Radiographs and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Precision of Tibiofemoral Angle Assessment: A Comparative Analysis of Long Leg Radiographs and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Danaithep Limskul, MD, THAILAND Theeraphat Kotimanusvanij, MD, THAILAND Napatpong Thamrongskulsiri, MD, THAILAND Thun Itthipanichpong, MD, THAILAND Thanathep Tanpowpong, MD, THAILAND Somsak Kuptniratsaikul, MD, THAILAND

Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, THAILAND


2025 Congress   ePoster Presentation   2025 Congress   Not yet rated

 

Anatomic Location

Anatomic Structure

Diagnosis Method


Summary: The tibiofemoral angle (TFA), lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, and joint congruent angle differ significantly between MRI and long leg alignment radiograph, these measurements, particularly the TFA, show limited reproducibility across observers, highlighting the challenges in reliably assessing knee alignment using different imaging modalities.


Background

The tibiofemoral angle (TFA), lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (aMPTA) and joint line congruence angle (JLCA) are important variables for assessing knee alignment and is used in various applications, including evaluating knee status, pre-operative planning, and post-operative evaluation.

Purpose

To compare the reliability of measuring the TFA, aLDFT, aMPTA, and JLCA by evaluating the angle measurements in long leg radiographs (LLR) and MRI.

Methods

The retrospective study included patients aged 18-50 years who had knee MRI scans together with LLR. Two orthopedics surgeons measured TFA, aLDFA, aMPTA, and JLCA from both modalities in random sequences. The paired t-test was used to compare angles from these two modalities. The Bland-Altman analysis was used to evaluate the agreement and bias. Intraclass correlation coefficients(ICC) were calculated to consider intra- and interobserver reliability and reproducibility.

Results

Fifty-seven knees were included. TFA in MRI images was significantly larger(7.28±4.05 vs 4.81±2.56 degrees, P<0.001). For the other angle, aLDFA and JLCA in MRI images were significantly smaller (77.40±3.08 vs 80.61±3.69, P<0.001 and 1.91±1.35 vs 2.56±1.65, P=0.017 respectively). The aMPTA was not significantly different between the two modalities (87.02±3.87 vs 87.84±3.86, P=0.220). Intraclass coeffiecient for intraobserver is in good agreement for TFA for MRI (0.82) and LLR (0.87).

Conclusion

The measuring TFA, aLDFA, aMPTA, and JLCA angle cannot be reliably reproduced between individuals comparing MRI and LLR. LLR is important for evaluating the alignments of the knees.