Search Filters

  • Media Source
  • Presentation Format
  • Media Type
  • Media Year
  • Language
  • Diagnosis / Condition
  • Diagnosis Method
  • Patient Populations
  • Treatment / Technique

Complications Following Isolated Primary Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Dislocations: A Systematic Review

myRating

Complications Following Isolated Primary Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Dislocations: A Systematic Review

Garrett Jackson, MD, UNITED STATES Harkirat Jawanda, BS, UNITED STATES Enzo Salviato Mameri, MD, MSc, BRAZIL Joan Sugrañes, SPAIN Johnathon Robert Mccormick, MD, UNITED STATES Zeeshan Khan, BA, UNITED STATES Daniel James Kaplan, MD, UNITED STATES Adam B. Yanke, MD, UNITED STATES Derrick Michael Knapik, MD, UNITED STATES Nikhil N. Verma, MD, UNITED STATES Jorge Chahla, MD, PhD, UNITED STATES

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, UNITED STATES


2023 Congress   ePoster Presentation   2023 Congress   Not yet rated

 

Diagnosis / Condition

Treatment / Technique

Anatomic Location

Diagnosis Method


Summary: Complications following primary MPFL reconstruction were recorded in 12.3% of knees, primarily consisting of the development of patellofemoral degenerative changes. Failure was reported in 2% of knees, while patellar fractures were reported in 1.1% of knees. Fractures primarily occurred with a full-length transverse tunnel or two-tunnel techniques, while all fractures occurred with patellar tunnel


Purpose

To systematically review the incidence of complications following primary MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability.

Study Design: Systematic Review; Level of Evidence IV.

Methods

A literature search was conducted by querying PubMed and Scopus databases from database inception through August 2022 according to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines using the terms ‘Medial Patellofemoral Ligament’, ‘MPFL’, ‘reconstruction’, ‘patellar’, and ‘instability’. Inclusion criteria included studies reporting complications following primary MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability. Exclusion criteria consisted of studies reporting on patients undergoing concurrent osteotomy procedures, revision reconstruction, and biomechanical or anatomic studies. The overall incidence of specific complications was estimated from the pooled sample of the included studies.

Results

Twenty-eight studies, consisting of 1478 patients (n=1521 knees), with a mean age of 23.3 years (mean range, 19 – 34.3 years) were identified. The overall incidence of complications was 12.3% (n=187/1521). Failure was estimated in 2% (range, 0% - 10.7%) of knees, while patellar fractures occurred in 1.1% (range, 0% - 8.3%) of knees, primarily in patients treated with a full-length transverse tunnel or two-tunnel techniques. All patellar fractures occurred in patients with patellar tunnels ranging from 4.5 mm to 6.0 mm in diameter. The development of patellofemoral degenerative changes was reported in a single study, with a calculated incidence of 23.9%. The incidence of postoperative knee stiffness/range of motion deficit was 3% (range, 0% - 20%). Total pain instances, including persistent anterior knee pain, were reported in 8.0% (range, 0% - 40.6%) of knees.

Conclusion

Complications following primary MPFL reconstruction were recorded in 12.3% of knees, primarily consisting of the development of patellofemoral degenerative changes. Failure was reported in 2% of knees, while patellar fractures were reported in 1.1% of knees. Fractures primarily occurred with a full-length transverse tunnel or two-tunnel techniques, while all fractures occurred with patellar tunnels ranging from 4.5 mm to 6.0 mm in diameter.


More 2023 ISAKOS Congress Content