A Comprehensive 6-Phase Prehabilitation And Rehabilitation Program For Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Repair Of Full-Thickness Gluteus Medius And/Or Minimus Tears

A Comprehensive 6-Phase Prehabilitation And Rehabilitation Program For Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Repair Of Full-Thickness Gluteus Medius And/Or Minimus Tears

Jonathan S. Lee, BA, UNITED STATES Stephen M. Gillinov, AB, UNITED STATES Bilal Siddiq, BS, UNITED STATES Kieran Sinclair Dowley, BA, UNITED STATES Jeffrey S. Mun, BA, UNITED STATES Nathan J. Cherian, MD, UNITED STATES Christopher T. Eberlin, BS, UNITED STATES Brandon J. Allen , BA, UNITED STATES Scott D. Martin, MD, UNITED STATES

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, UNITED STATES


2025 Congress   ePoster Presentation   2025 Congress   Not yet rated

 

Anatomic Location

Anatomic Structure

Diagnosis / Condition

Treatment / Technique

Patient Populations

Diagnosis Method


Summary: Patients who underwent a 6-phase prehabilitation/rehabilitation protocol for endoscopic repair of full-thickness gluteus medius and/or minimus tears achieved significant improvements in functional outcomes despite their high risk of post-operative failure


Introduction

The majority of patients undergoing surgical management for gluteus medius and/or minimus tears do not complete formal pre-operative physical therapy. Prehabilitation consisting of gait training with a walker while maintaining a level pelvis, building upper body strength in the arms in preparation for post-operative ambulatory aids, and strengthening the dampening muscles of the hip (e.g., lower abdominal core, lower back, quadriceps, gluteal muscles, iliotibial band) is crucial for optimizing post-operative recovery. Furthermore, previously published rehabilitation protocols for gluteus medius and/or minimus patients fail to consider the risks of surgical repair site disruption from early hip abduction and strengthening exercises in the intermediate post-operative period. Thus, to improve long-term outcomes for patients undergoing endoscopic gluteus medius and/or minimus repair, the purpose of the present study was to (1) provide a comprehensive prehabilitation and rehabilitation protocol and (2) demonstrate the efficacy of this protocol by reporting mid-term patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Methods

This was a prospective study of patients ≥ 18 years old with minimum 2-year follow-up who underwent endoscopic repair for symptomatic full-thickness gluteus medius and/or minimus tendon tears. Tears were classified intra-operatively as either full-thickness (tear involving > two-thirds the width of the tendon) or partial-thickness (tear involving ≤ two-thirds the width of the tendon). All patients followed a standard 6-phase prehabilitation/rehabilitation protocol that consisted of: (1) Prehabilitation [3 months pre-operatively]; (2) Immediate Post-operative Recovery [0-6 weeks post-operatively]; (3) Endurance and Strength [6-12 weeks post-operatively]; (4) Balance, Coordination, and ROM [3-6 months post-operatively]; (5) Home Exercise/physical therapy [6-12 months post-operatively]; and (6) Gradual Return to Sport/Recreational Activity [12-24 months post-operatively]. The Gluteus-Score-7 (GS7) was calculated to estimate a patient’s risk of post-operative clinical failure. Outcomes were assessed pre-operatively and at 3-, 6-, 12-, 24-, and 60-month post-operative timepoints; they included hip abduction strength, Trendelenburg gait, retear rate, and the following PROMs: modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score (HOS)–Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), HOS–Sports Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), 33-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score.

Results

Overall, 26 patients (age, 67.5 ± 7.2 (range: 48-81); BMI, 28.8 ± 4.1; 76.9% female) met inclusion criteria. All patients had full-thickness tears, of which 46.1% (n=12) were retracted more than 2 cm. Patients had an average GS7 score of 4.8 ± 1.2, indicating a high risk of post-operative failure. At baseline, patients had the following mean ± SD PROMs: mHHS (55.6 ± 16.6), HOS-ADL (50.4 ± 15.9), HOS-SSS (23.1 ± 24.1), NAHS (55.7 ± 13.0), iHOT-12 (35.6 ± 15.5), and VAS (5.8 ± 2.8). After undergoing endoscopic repair and following the patient-guided rehabilitation protocol, patients achieved significant improvements in all PROMs besides HOS-SSS at 3-, 6-, 12-, 24-, and 60-month follow-up. By 2-year follow-up, 100% (n = 26%) of patients achieved 5/5 hip abduction strength, only 1 patient (3.8%) re-developed a Trendelenburg gait, and no patients experienced a tendon re-tear. Despite having a high overall GS7 score, patients achieved high rates of 2-year MCID by the end of Phase 6 of the 2-year rehabilitation protocol.

Conclusion

Patients who underwent a 6-phase prehabilitation/rehabilitation protocol for endoscopic repair of full-thickness gluteus medius and/or minimus tears achieved significant improvements in functional outcomes despite their high risk of post-operative failure. PROM improvements began as early as 3 months post-operatively and were sustained at long-term follow-up with excellent 5-year outcomes. These findings highlight the value of implementing formal prehabilitation and a conservative, patient-guided rehabilitation protocol that avoids early hip abduction and strengthening exercises in the intermediate post-operative period.