Effects Of Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Disadvantage On Hip Arthroscopy Patients

Effects Of Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Disadvantage On Hip Arthroscopy Patients

Jonathan S. Lee, BA, UNITED STATES Stephen M. Gillinov, AB, UNITED STATES Bilal Siddiq, BS, UNITED STATES Kieran Sinclair Dowley, BA, UNITED STATES Nathan J. Cherian, MD, UNITED STATES Christopher T. Eberlin, BS, UNITED STATES Jeffrey S Mun , BA, UNITED STATES Rachel L Poutre, BS , UNITED STATES Srish S. Chenna, BSE, UNITED STATES Scott D. Martin, MD, UNITED STATES

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston , Massachusetts, UNITED STATES


2025 Congress   ePoster Presentation   2025 Congress   Not yet rated

 

Anatomic Location

Anatomic Structure

Diagnosis / Condition

Treatment / Technique

Sports Medicine

Labrum


Summary: Although hip arthroscopy patients experiencing greater neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage exhibited significantly lower preoperative baseline scores, this disparity resolved at 1-year follow-up.


PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of the present study is to investigate the influence of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status (SES) on functional outcomes following hip arthroscopy. We hypothesize that patients experiencing greater neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage would report worse pre-operative baseline PROM scores and post-operative outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data queried patients aged greater than 18 years with minimum 1-year follow-up who underwent hip arthroscopy for the treatment of symptomatic labral tears secondary to FAI. The study population was divided into ADILow and ADIHigh cohorts according to ADI score, a validated measurement of neighborhood-level SES standardized to yield a score between 1 and 100. Collected patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) included the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score (HOS)–Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), HOS–Sports Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), 33-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33), VAS pain score, and patient satisfaction.

Results

228 patients met inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. After stratifying patients by ADI score, the ADILow (n = 113; ADI: 5.8 ± 3.0; range: 1 to 12) and ADIHigh (n=115; ADI: 28.0 ± 14.5; range: 13 to 97) cohorts had no differences in baseline patient demographics. When comparing mean pre-operative baseline PROM scores between groups, a lower ADI score (ADILow) was associated with significantly higher scores compared to ADIHigh for all 5 PROMs: mHHS (66.3 ± 13.1 vs 61.8 ± 14.9; P = 0.017), HOS-ADL (74.5 ± 17.7 vs 67.6 ± 18.7; P = 0.005), HOS-SSS (47.8 ± 24.1 vs 41.1 ± 23.7; P = 0.034), NAHS (68.2 ± 16.8 vs 63.0 ± 17.3; P = 0.023), and iHOT-33 (43.8 ± 16.9 vs 38.6 ± 17.4; P = 0.024). At 1-year follow-up, these disparities resolved with both groups reporting statistically similar functional outcomes for all PROMs (P > 0.05). Furthermore, patients in both cohorts achieved similar rates of MCID for all 5 PROMs and PASS for 4 PROMs. When controlling for patient demographics, however, patients with higher ADI scores had greater odds of achieving MCID for all PROMs except for iHOT-33.

Conclusions

Although hip arthroscopy patients experiencing greater neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage exhibited significantly lower preoperative baseline scores, this disparity resolved at 1-year follow-up. In fact, when adjusting for patient characteristics including ADI score, more disadvantaged patients achieved greater odds of achieving MCID. The present study is merely a first step towards understanding health inequities among patients seeking orthopaedic care.