Search Filters

  • Presentation Format
  • Media Type
  • Diagnosis / Condition
  • Diagnosis Method
  • Patient Populations
  • Treatment / Technique

Value, Limitations And Recommendations For Use Of Metal-Reduction Knee MRI Sequences Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2021 Congress Paper Abstracts

Value, Limitations And Recommendations For Use Of Metal-Reduction Knee MRI Sequences Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Brandon Zhao, MD, CANADA Nabil Khan, MBChB, MMED, FCS Orth, CANADA Mark F. Sommerfeldt, MD, CANADA Anukul Panu, MD, CANADA Jacob L Jaremko, MD, PhD, CANADA Catherine May Ting Hui, MD, FRCSC, CANADA

University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA


2021 Congress   Abstract Presentation   6 minutes   Not yet rated

 

Anatomic Location

Diagnosis / Condition

Diagnosis Method

MRI

Treatment / Technique

Ligaments

ACL

This media is available to ISAKOS 2021: Global Registrants and On Demand purchases only.
Please log in or purchase to access.


Summary: Use of metal artifact reduction sequences (WARP and SEMAC) significantly improved diagnostic accuracy and confidence in detection of ACL graft tears. When the key clinical question is ACL graft integrity, our study supports adding a WARP sequence to the routine knee MRI scan protocol.


Background

No study to date has evaluated the utility of MRI with metal artifact reduction sequencing (MARS) In the assessment of ACL grafts. MRI assessment of ACL graft integrity following ACL reconstruction is challenging due to magnetic susceptibility artifacts distorting or obscuring the graft and tunnels.

Purpose

To determine whether MRI with MARS is superior to conventional knee MRI in visualization and diagnostic accuracy for ACL graft rupture.
Study Design
Retrospective case series.

Methods

18 patients, 19 knees (male, 6; female, 12; age, 33 + 11.9 years) who underwent conventional MRI sequence (PD) and two types of MARS MRI (WARP, SEMAC; Siemens) following secondary injury to their ACL reconstructed knee. Six readers with knee MRI experience reviewed sagittal PD, WARP and SEMAC sequences, providing semi-quantitative grades for visualization and diagnostic confidence regarding ACL, PCL, menisci, tibial and femoral tunnel margins, and articular cartilage.

Results

Compared to PD, WARP improved visualization of ACL (mean semi-quantitative score 3.79 vs 3.96, p=0.009), femoral tunnel (3.70 vs 4.01, p=0.001), and tibial tunnels (3.56 vs 3.92, p<0.0001), although at the cost of poorer visualization of femoral articular cartilage (4.70 vs 4.59, p=0.033), tibial articular cartilage (4.70 vs 4.58, p=0.022), medial meniscus (4.75 vs 4.53, p=0.001), and lateral meniscus (4.72 vs 4.56, p=0.026). SEMAC performed similarly to WARP, except that WARP provided significantly better visualization of cartilage and menisci than SEMAC (p<0.00001 each). Diagnostic confidence of ACL integrity was significantly improved over PD for both WARP (1.70 vs 2.17, p = 0.034), and SEMAC (1.70 vs 2.61, p = 0.032). There was no significant difference in diagnostic confidence between WARP and SEMAC (p = 0.071).
There was no significant difference in the interobserver reliability between each sequence. The WARP sequence added 2.84 + 0.69 minutes while SEMAC added 2.95 + 0.40 minutes to the standard knee MRI scan time.

Conclusion

Use of metal artifact reduction sequences (WARP and SEMAC) significantly improved diagnostic accuracy and confidence in detection of ACL graft tears. When the key clinical question is ACL graft integrity, our study supports adding a WARP sequence to the routine knee MRI scan protocol.


More ISAKOS 2021: Global Content