Search Filters

  • Presentation Format
  • Media Type
  • Diagnosis / Condition
  • Diagnosis Method
  • Patient Populations
  • Treatment / Technique

Acl Deficiency Influences Medio-Lateral Tibial Alignment And Knee Varus–Valgus During In Vivo Activities

2021 Congress Paper Abstracts

Acl Deficiency Influences Medio-Lateral Tibial Alignment And Knee Varus–Valgus During In Vivo Activities

Piero Agostinone, MD, ITALY Stefano Di Paolo, Eng, ITALY Alberto Grassi, MD, ITALY Marco Bontempi, ITALY Erika Pinelli, MsC, ITALY Laura Bragonzoni, PhD, ITALY Stefano Zaffagnini, MD, Prof., ITALY

IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, ITALY


2021 Congress   Abstract Presentation   3 minutes   Not yet rated

 

Anatomic Location

Anatomic Structure

Diagnosis / Condition

Ligaments

ACL

Diagnosis Method

Sports Medicine

This media is available to ISAKOS 2021: Global Registrants and On Demand purchases only.
Please log in or purchase to access.


Summary: Dynamic radiostereometry evaluation of ACL deficiency


Purpose

The role of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in knee biomechanics in vivo and under weight-bearing is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the tibiofemoral kinematics of ACL-deficient knees to healthy contralateral ones during the execution of weight-bearing activities.

Methods

Eight patients with isolated ACL injury and healthy contralateral knees were included in the study. Patients were asked to perform a single step forward and a single leg squat first with the injured knee and then with the contralateral one. Knee motion was determined using a validated model-based tracking process that matched subject-specific MRI bone models to dynamic biplane radiographic images, under the principles of Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). Data processing was performed in a specific software developed in Matlab.

Results

Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were found for single leg squat along the frontal plane: ACL-deficient knees showed a more varus angle, especially at the highest knee flexion angles (40°–50° on average), compared to the contralateral knees. Furthermore, ACL-deficient knees showed tibial medialization along the entire task, while contralateral knees were always laterally aligned. This difference became statistically relevant (p < 0.05) for knee flexion angles included between 0° and about 30°.

Conclusion

ACL-deficient knees showed an abnormal tibial medialization and increased varus angle during single leg squat when compared to the contralateral knees. These biomechanical anomalies could cause a different force distribution on tibial plateau, explaining the higher risk of early osteoarthritis in ACL deficiency. The clinical relevance of this study is that also safe activities used in ACL rehabilitation protocols are significantly altered in ACL deficiency.


More ISAKOS 2021: Global Content