Pre-Operative Risk Factor Analysis For Ipsilateral Reinjury Following Contemporary Acl Primary Repair At 6-Year Follow-Up

Pre-Operative Risk Factor Analysis For Ipsilateral Reinjury Following Contemporary Acl Primary Repair At 6-Year Follow-Up

Maximilian M. Müller, MD, UNITED STATES Sebastian Rilk, MD, UNITED STATES Gabriel C. Goodhart, BsC, UNITED STATES Fabian Tomanek, Dr. med. univ., AUSTRIA Victor Beckers, MD, UNITED STATES Fidelius Von Rehlingen-Prinz, MD, UNITED STATES Robert O'Brien, MHS, PA-C, UNITED STATES Gregory S. Difelice, MD, UNITED STATES

Hospital for Special Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, UNITED STATES


2025 Congress   ePoster Presentation   2025 Congress   Not yet rated

 

Diagnosis / Condition

Treatment / Technique

Diagnosis Method

MRI


Summary: Age is identified as a significant risk factor for ACLPR reinjury, with a 12.5% decreased risk of failure for each additional year of age, indicating that younger patients experience higher rates of reinjury.


Purpose

To identify preoperative risk factors for ipsilateral ACL reinjury following ACLPR with a minimum follow-up of 5-years.

Methods

This prospective cohort study evaluated the outcomes of the first 113 consecutive patients with proximal ACL tears who underwent ACL primary repair (ACLPR) by a single surgeon, at minimum 5-year follow-up. Assessment included knee laxity testing, Pivot shift test, and a standardized patient interview to evaluate any potential for ipsilateral reinjury. To identify preoperative risk factors for ipsilateral reinjury, univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used. Preoperative risk factors included demographic (sex, age, BMI, activity level, surgery delay) and clinical variables (pivot shift grade, concomitant injuries).

Results

Outcomes were assessed for 107 patients (median age 35.5 years, IQR 22.4-43.1) at the final follow-up (median 6.0 years, IQR 5.3-7.0). Six patients (5%) were lost to follow-up. Analysis of preoperative risk factors showed that younger age significantly affected ACLPR survival negatively (p = 0.002), with a 12.5% reduction in the risk of failure for each additional year of age. Additional demographic (sex, BMI, activity level, surgery delay) and clinical characteristics (pivot shift grade, concomitant injuries) did not show a significant impact on the survival of the ipsilateral ACL following ACLPR over a minimum 5-year follow-up.

Conclusion

Age is identified as a significant risk factor for ACLPR reinjury, with a 12.5% decreased risk of failure for each additional year of age, indicating that younger patients experience higher rates of reinjury.