Search Filters

  • Media Source
  • Presentation Format
  • Media Type
  • Media Year
  • Language
  • Diagnosis / Condition
  • Diagnosis Method
  • Patient Populations
  • Treatment / Technique

Analysis of Patient Reported Outcomes and Subsequent Surgery Rate Following Quadriceps Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Lateral extra-articular Tenodesis in Skeletally Immature Patients: Two Year Follow-Up

Analysis of Patient Reported Outcomes and Subsequent Surgery Rate Following Quadriceps Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Lateral extra-articular Tenodesis in Skeletally Immature Patients: Two Year Follow-Up

Sofia Hidalgo Perea, BS, UNITED STATES Danielle E. Chipman, BS, UNITED STATES Frank A. Cordasco, MD, MS, UNITED STATES Daniel W. Green, MD, MS, UNITED STATES

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, UNITED STATES


2023 Congress   ePoster Presentation   2023 Congress   Not yet rated

 

Anatomic Location

Anatomic Structure

Diagnosis / Condition

Treatment / Technique

Ligaments

ACL

Diagnosis Method

MRI


Summary: The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in pediatric and adolescent patients is increasing significantly and many patients possess risk factors that predispose to ACL re-tear. A LET when performing an ACLR is safe and should be considered as a concomitant procedure for adolescent patients that are at high risk of re-tear.


Background

The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in pediatric and adolescent patients is increasing significantly and many patients possess risk factors that predispose to ACL re-tear. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) may be performed in conjunction with ACLR to reduce the risk of ACL re-tear.

Purpose

To evaluate the 2-year clinical outcomes of ACLR with soft tissue quadriceps tendon (QUAD) autograft and a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) using a modified Lemaire technique in skeletally immature patients.

Methods

A consecutive series of patients who underwent QUAD tendon autograft ACLR and LET with a minimum of 2-year follow-up data was analyzed retrospectively. ACLR techniques included all-epiphyseal (AE) and complete transphyseal (CT) and were indicated based on skeletal age. Outcome measures included participants’ return to sports (RTS), concomitant or subsequent surgical procedures and multiple patient-reported outcome measures, including Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee (Pedi-IKDC) and HSS Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS) scores.

Results

The final cohort included 50 consecutive adolescent patients aged 11 to 16 years (mean 14.2 ± 1 years) with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Two patients were lost to follow-up. Of the patients included in the study (n=48), 98% participated in high-risk competitive sports (Table 1). Two patients (4%) were revision ACLR. Ten (21%) patients underwent AE and 38 (79%) underwent CT ACLR. Sixteen patients (33%) had subsequent surgical procedures, including 5 contralateral ACLR, 4 meniscus surgeries, 4 QUAD autograft scar revision, 4 irrigation and debridement (2 patients, 2 each) and 3 hardware removal procedures (2 for hemi-epiphysiodesis and 1 tibial socket button removal). The rate of graft failure was 0%. At two-year follow-up, mean SANE score was 93, mean Pedi-IKDC score was 90, and mean HSS-Pedi-FABS score was 23. RTS rate was 100%.

Conclusion

A LET when performing an ACLR is safe and should be considered as a concomitant procedure for adolescent patients that are at high risk of re-tear.


More 2023 ISAKOS Congress Content