Search Filters

  • Presentation Format
  • Media Type
  • Diagnosis / Condition
  • Diagnosis Method
  • Patient Populations
  • Treatment / Technique

Effectiveness Of In-Office Ultrasound For The Management Of Suspected Rotator Cuff And Biceps Pathology: An Institutional Evaluation of Surgeons With No Formal Training

Effectiveness Of In-Office Ultrasound For The Management Of Suspected Rotator Cuff And Biceps Pathology: An Institutional Evaluation of Surgeons With No Formal Training

Jarret M. Woodmass, MD, FRCSC, CANADA Sheila McRae, PhD, MSc, CANADA Jamie Dubberley, MD, CANADA Jonathon Marsh, MD, CANADA Jason A. Old, MD, FRCSC, CANADA Gregory Adam Stranges, MD, CANADA Shahbaz S Malik, BSc, MB BCh, MSc (Orth Engin), LLM, FRCS (Tr&Orth), UNITED KINGDOM Jeff Leiter, PhD, CANADA Peter B. MacDonald, MD, FRCS, Dip Sport Med, CANADA

Pan Am Clinic, Winnipeg, Manitoba, CANADA


2021 Congress   ePoster Presentation     Not yet rated

 

Anatomic Location

Anatomic Structure

Diagnosis / Condition

Sports Medicine

Treatment / Technique

This media is available to current ISAKOS Members, Global Link All-Access Subscribers and Webinar/Course Registrants only.

Summary: In a study of five fellowship trained surgeons each performing ultrasound on 50 patients, in-office ultrasound performed without formal training resulted in moderate capacity to detect rotator cuff and biceps pathology when compared to MRI as the standard and was an effective tool for clinical decision-making allowing a diagnosis and treatment plan to be made in over 88% of patients.


Objective

When compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound (US) performed by experienced users is an inexpensive tool that has good sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing rotator cuff (RC) tears. However, many practitioners are now utilizing in-office US with little to no formal training as an adjunct to clinical evaluation. The objective of our study was to determine if US without formal training is effective in managing patients with a suspected RC tear.

Methods

This was a single-centre prospective observational study. Five fellowship-trained surgeons each examined 50 participants referred for a suspected RC tear (n= 250). Patients were included if = 40 years old, had an MRI of their affected shoulder, had failed conservative treatment of at least 6 months, and had ongoing pain and disability. Patients were excluded if they had glenohumeral instability, evidence of major joint trauma, or osteonecrosis. After routine clinical exam, surgeons recorded their treatment plan (“No Surgery”, “Uncertain”, or “Surgery”). Surgeons then performed an in-office diagnostic US followed by an MRI and documented their treatment plan after each imaging study. Agreement between US and MRI was evaluated for the rotator cuff muscles and biceps..

Results

Following clinical assessment, the treatment plan was recorded as “No Surgery” in 90 (36%), “Uncertain” in 96 (39%) of cases, “Surgery” in 61 (25%) cases, and incomplete in 3 (2%). In-office US allowed resolution of 66 (69%) of uncertain cases with 199 (81%) of patients having a definitive treatment plan. One hundred-thirteen patients were designated as not requiring surgery based on clinical assessment and US, of which MRI identified pathology warranting surgery (6% of the study sample). MRI resolved 25 of 30 of the remaining 'Uncertain' cases. The positive likelihood ratio (PLR) for supra/infraspinatus for ultrasound versus MRI was 1.27 and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.45. For subscapularis, PLR was 2.83 and NLR was 0.45. For biceps, the PLR was 3.24 and NLR was 0.41.

Conclusion

In-office ultrasound performed without formal training resulted in moderate capacity to detect rotator cuff and biceps pathology when compared to MRI and was an effective tool for clinical decision-making allowing a diagnosis and treatment plan to be made in over 88% of patients. A small percentage (6%) of patients with surgical pathology including full-thickness rotator cuff tears, larger than expected tears and/or alternate glenohumeral pathology (e.g., labral tear) were missed at initial evaluation using in-office ultrasound.


More ISAKOS 2021: Global Content