Does ACL Reconstruction Augmented by Remnant Fibers Reinsertion in Addition to Hamstring Graft Improve Outcomes: Results of a Cohort of 68 Patients at 3-Year Follow-Up


Nicolas Bouguennec, MD
FRANCE

myRating

Does ACL Reconstruction Augmented by Remnant Fibers Reinsertion in Addition to Hamstring Graft Improve Outcomes: Results of a Cohort of 68 Patients at 3-Year Follow-Up

Nicolas Bouguennec, MD, FRANCE Corentin Herce, MD, FRANCE Pierre Laboudie, MD, FRANCE Nicolas Graveleau, MD, FRANCE Philippe Colombet, MD, FRANCE

Sports Clinic of Bordeaux-Merignac, MERIGNAC, FRANCE

2025 Congress   ePoster Presentation   2025 Congress   Not yet rated

 

Anatomic Location

Knee

Anatomic Structure

Ligaments

Diagnosis / Condition

Instability

Treatment / Technique

Repair / Reconstruction Arthroscopy Autograft Biologics

Ligaments

ACL

Patient Populations

Professional Athletes / Olympians Sport Specific Population

Diagnosis Method

Physical Examination MRI

Sports Medicine

Practice Management Evidence Based Medicine Outcome Studies

Summary: Despite a longer and technically more difficult procedure, an augmentation technique for ACL reconstructions using a hamstring and reinsertion of residual fibers did not improve functional outcomes or decrease complication rates.

Introduction

Complication rates after ACL reconstruction remain important despite the evolution of techniques. Isolated ACL repairs did not provide improvement and techniques with augmentation have therefore been described. Our hypothesis was that an increase of the graft by reinsertion of the residual ACL fibers of the remnant associated with the graft would improve the results.

Method

We carried out a prospective continuous series of 68 patients who underwent augmentation (AS) with a hamstring and reinsertion of the ACL fibers of the remnant. The technique consisted of a reconstruction of the ACL type ST4 with fixation by 2 adjustable endo-buttons and reinsertion of the residual fibers with passage of the reinsertion wires in the femoral fixation. This series was compared to a control series (CS) of 71 patients with classic ACL reconstruction and hamstring graft. The inclusion criteria were a technique with ACL augmentation, no additional procedure such as lateral tenodesis/Anterolateral Ligament and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Rates of re-rupture, reoperation and postoperative subjective scores (SKV, IKDC, ACL-RSI) were evaluated.

Results

The 2 groups were comparable preoperatively for all parameters studied (sex, age, BMI, meniscal lesions). At a mean follow-up of 3 years, in AS, 4 patients were excluded because they were lost to follow-up and 6 patients (9%) had a re-rupture of the ACL. We did not find any significant difference regarding the re-rupture rate: 6/64 ±1.9 (AS) vs 2/71 ±2.5 (SC), p =0.7), the reoperation rate (3/64 ±1.9 (AS) vs 4/71 ±2.1 (SC), p=0.9) or functional scores: SKV = 84.4 ±18.1 (AS) vs 88.8 ±10.6 (SC) (p=0.2), IKDC = 85.4 ± 12.8 (AS) vs 87.8 9.8 (SC) (p = 0.6), ACL-RSI = 68 .4 ±25.5 (AS) vs. 71.1 22.1 (SC) (p = 0.7).

Conclusion

An augmentation technique for ACL reconstructions with reinsertion of residual fibers of the remnant of the ACL did not improve functional outcomes or decrease complication rates despite a longer and technically more difficult procedure. Our results may be linked to insufficient follow-up or numbers of patients, but these were 2 comparable series with follow-up longer than 2 years.

Knee ACL ePosters