Search Filters

  • Presentation Format
  • Media Type
  • Diagnosis / Condition
  • Diagnosis Method
  • Patient Populations
  • Treatment / Technique

A comparison of the transtibial pullout technique and all-inside meniscal repair in medial meniscus posterior root tear: Prognostic factors and midterm clinical outcomes

2021 Congress Paper Abstracts

A comparison of the transtibial pullout technique and all-inside meniscal repair in medial meniscus posterior root tear: Prognostic factors and midterm clinical outcomes

Lika Dzidzishvili, MD, SPAIN Irene Isabel López-Torres, MD, PhD, SPAIN Jm Arguello, MD, PhD, SPAIN David Sáez, MD, SPAIN Amaya Barberia, MD, SPAIN Emilio Calvo, MD, PhD, MBA, SPAIN

Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, SPAIN

2021 Congress   ePoster Presentation     rating (1)


Anatomic Location

Anatomic Structure

Diagnosis / Condition

Diagnosis Method

This media is available to ISAKOS 2021: Global Registrants and On Demand purchases only.
Please log in or purchase to access.

Summary: All-inside meniscal suture of medial meniscal posterior root tears showed a comparable clinical and radiological outcome with transtibial pullout technique in middle-age patients


There is a paucity of comparative clinical data between arthroscopic all-inside end-to-end meniscal root suture and transtibial pullout technique in medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT).

This study aimed to compare treatment failure, mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes of all-inside meniscus root repair versus the transtibial pullout technique and to analyze prognostic factors of postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes.

Study Design & Methods

Forty-four patients were included in two therapeutic group: arthroscopic all-inside meniscal suture (MS: 13 knees) and transtibial pullout technique (TP: 31 knees).
Primary clinical outcomes at a minimum of 27.2 months postoperatively included Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Lysholm Knee Questionnare (LKQ). Radiographic assessment of the knee was performed to determine osteoarthritis severity using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading system.
In addition, pre and postoperative MRI scans and intraoperative arthroscopic findings were recorded and the correlations between these findings, as outcome predictors and postoperative patients reported subjective outcome were assessed.


No significant differences in postoperative KOOS and LKQ scores were found between the MS and TP group (p=0.38 and 0.17, respectively.
During follow-up one patients (7.7%) in the MS group and two (6.5%) in the TP group underwent total knee arthroplasty. The difference did not reach the statistical significance (p=0.88).
No differences were observed in postoperative MRI findings such as meniscal extrusion, osteochondral defect, chondromalacia patella, and bone morrow edema (p=0.25, 0.97, 0.97, and 0.88, respectively).
A univariate model revealed that the presence of postoperative meniscal extrusion; osteochondral defect; chondromalacia patella; increased BMI; age (>40 years) and longer time lapse between clinical onset to surgery (>6 months) were predictors of poor clinical outcome. The presence of meniscal extrusion, osteochondral defect and chondropatia patella portended worst postoperative outcomes in a multiple linear regression model.


It can be concluded that both techniques can reach good results when performed properly and if the injury pattern allows meniscal suture may be considered a treatment option for the management of MMPRT in well-selected patients.
Patients with increased BMI, preoperative meniscal extrusion, chondromalacia patella, and osteochondral defect were at higher risk of poor clinical outcomes.

More ISAKOS 2021: Global Content