2025 ISAKOS Biennial Congress ePoster
Joint Line Convergence Angle After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison Between Mechanical V/S Patient-Specific Alignment With Robotic Assisted Surgery: Retrospective Data Of 98 Patients
David H. Figueroa, MD, Santiago, RM CHILE
Waldo Gonzalez Duque, MD, Las Condes, Santiago CHILE
Loreto Figueroa, MD, santiago CHILE
Francisco Figueroa, MD, Santiago, RM CHILE
Rodrigo Guiloff, MD, Prof, Santiago, Vitacura CHILE
Clinica Alemana Santiago, Las Condes, Santiago, CHILE
FDA Status Cleared
Summary
The JLCA improved post-operatively in both mechanical and patient-specific alignment strategies after robotic assisted TKA without significant differences between strategies
ePosters will be available shortly before Congress
Abstract
Introduction
As
Method
to improve patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), different alignment strategies have been performed to restore the femoral and tibial surfaces to their pre-arthritic state. Due to this change in paradigm, the knee joint line orientation (KJLO), an essential component of knee kinematics, has recently garnered interest as a clinical parameter.
This study aimed to evaluate the KJLO measured by the joint line convergence angle (JLCA) after TKA in two different alignment strategies while using robotic assisted surgery. We hypothesized that a patient-specific alignment strategy would lead to more JLCA values considered normal (0-2°).
Methods
A retrospective review of data from 98 patients (100 knees) that underwent robotic-assisted TKA was performed. Group I consisted of 50 knees that underwent TKA using a mechanical alignment strategy, and Group II consisted of 50 knees that underwent TKA using a patient-specific alignment strategy. The JLCA was measured by two different observers in pre-operative and post-operative radiographs. Statistical analysis was performed using T-Student test, chi-square test and linear regression for multivariate analysis.
Results
There were no statistically significant demographic differences between both groups regarding age, gender, side, body mass index, Kellgren Lawrence classification, pre-operative range of motion, and hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle measurement. Mean age was 69 years and 61.2% of all patients were females.
In Group I, the average pre-operative JLCA was 2.34º (1.49 SD), and the average post-operative JLCA was 0.35º (0.27 SD). In Group II, the average pre-operative JLCA was 2,43º (1.72 SD), and the post-operative average JLCA was 0.29º (0.24 SD). In Group I the mean difference between the pre and post operative JLCA was 2.34 (1.48 SD), and in Group II the mean difference between the pre and post-operative JLCA was 2.43 (1.72 SD). There was not a statistically significant difference between both groups regarding JLCA improvement (p=0.285).
Conclusions
The JLCA improved post-operatively in both mechanical and patient-specific alignment strategies after robotic assisted TKA without significant differences between strategies.